- Are you going to or too?
- How do you ask if there is a class tomorrow?
- When we use will or be going to?
- Are you going to or will you?
- Can you marry with me Google?
- Can and could grammar?
- What is the difference between to and for?
- Would you or will you marry me?
- Will you please or would you please?
- Will you marry me definition?
- Is could you please rude?
- Can you please send me or could you please send me?
Are you going to or too?
To is a preposition with several meanings, including “toward” and “until.” Too is an adverb that can mean “excessively” or “also.” Just to be clear: two is pronounced the same as to and too, but it can’t be used instead of either of them because it’s a number..
How do you ask if there is a class tomorrow?
“Will classes be there tomorrow?” questions the location of the classes, not if they will happen or not. For example, if your teacher has been mentioning a class-visit to a local park, you could ask “Will classes be there [meaning the park] tomorrow”. Will there be classes tomorrow is the correct one to use.
When we use will or be going to?
When you are making a decision use will; use going to after the decision has been made. We sometimes also use the present continuous for planned events in the near future. When we want to talk about future facts or things we believe to be true about the future, we use will.
Are you going to or will you?
When you’re talking about actions that you will do soon (tomorrow or next week), use GOING TO. When you want to ask/request for something, use WILL). When you’re expecting/anticipating something to happen, use GOING TO. Finally, when you promise something, use ‘WILL!
Can you marry with me Google?
Indian users have accepted Google Assistant quite well and it went to the extent that users have asked Google to marry them. … Indians have asked Google’s voice-based virtual assistant, “Ok Google, will you marry me?” among other queries. Google has received as many as 4.5 lakh marriage proposals in India.
Can and could grammar?
We sometimes use be able to instead of “can” or “could” for ability. Be able to is possible in all tenses – but “can” is possible only in the present and “could” is possible only in the past for ability. In addition, “can” and “could” have no infinitive form.
What is the difference between to and for?
As you can see in #6, TO or FOR can be used for a motive/reason, but TO is always with a verb, and FOR is always with a noun. Here’s a good example: I came to New York to work. I came to New York for a new job.
Would you or will you marry me?
‘ is correct. ‘Would you marry me? … ‘Will you marry me’ is a direct question, and when you ask it, you are literally asking someone if they would commit themselves to you at that moment, and it requires an answer. ‘Would you marry me’ is a vague question that asks of possiblities.
Will you please or would you please?
Or, could you please close the door? A. I don’t see much difference. But I would suppose that “would” is more polite, because it expresses the idea of probability, and of willingness, and of the desire that something be done, whereas “could” is more in the realm of ability (yes I can).
Will you marry me definition?
Will you marry me?: Do you want to be my husband or wife?
Is could you please rude?
First of all, “could you please” sounds more polite and less rude. When we say “Can you please…”, the question actually asks the subject whether they are capable of doing something. … On the contrary, “Could you please…” is a request which may be granted by the subject under favourable circumstances.
Can you please send me or could you please send me?
Both are correct. The first is more direct, and the second is more polite. Could you please . . . gives slightly more room for refusal than Can you please . . .